Identification and Prioritization of Effective Sports Policies for National Security Development: A Mixed-Methods Policy Framework
Keywords:
National Security; Sport Diplomacy; Soft Power; Public Policy; TOPSIS; Strategic GovernanceAbstract
This study aimed to identify and prioritize sports policies that contribute to national security development. Using a sequential exploratory mixed-methods design, the research integrated constructivist grounded theory with the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making technique. In the qualitative phase, 16 experts from sport governance, national security institutions, and academia were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using focused coding, leading to the identification of 32 policy actions grouped into eight strategic themes: roadmap design, inter-sectoral coordination, infrastructure development, support for specific groups, international engagement, alliance-building, sport promotion, and cultural development and support. In the quantitative phase, these policies were prioritized through TOPSIS based on expert weighting. Results indicated that “improving the country’s international image” ranked first, followed by “strategic policymaking and training,” and “strengthening diplomatic relations.” Findings highlight that soft power-oriented and sport diplomacy-based policies exert the greatest perceived impact on national security. The study provides a structured decision-making framework enabling policymakers to allocate resources more strategically. By moving beyond descriptive analysis of sport-security relationships, this research contributes a prescriptive and operational roadmap for leveraging sport as an instrument of national resilience and geopolitical positioning.
Downloads
References
Behzadian, M., Khanmohammadi Otaghsara, S., Yazdani, M., & Ignatius, J. (2012). A state-of-the-art survey of TOPSIS applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(17), 13051-13069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.056
Buzan, B., Wæver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Camiré, M., Santos, F., Newman, T., Vella, S., MacDonald, D. J., Milistetd, M., & Strachan, L. (2023). Positive youth development as a guiding framework in sport research. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 69, 102505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102505
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Grix, J., & Brannagan, P. M. (2016). Of mechanisms and myths: Conceptualising states’ “soft power” strategies through sports mega-events. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 27(2), 251-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2016.1169791
Grix, J., & Brannagan, P. M. (2024). Sports mega-events as foreign policy: Sport diplomacy, soft power, and sportswashing. American Behavioral Scientist. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642241262042
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guo, J., Yang, H., & Zhang, X. (2024). How watching sports events empowers people’s sense of wellbeing? Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1471658. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1471658
Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Lee, J. W., & Krieger, J. (2024). Sport diplomacy and global politics in the twenty-first century. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(4), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2023.2185580
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Menaker, B. E., Sheptak, D., Kurland, J., & Tekin, D. (2024). Rethinking sport event security. Journal of Global Sport Management, 9(2), 346-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/24704067.2023.2165165
Millwood, P. (2022). Improbable diplomats: How ping-pong players, musicians, and scientists remade US–China relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108915660
Moustakas, L. (2024). Sport for social cohesion: A conceptual framework linking common practices and theory. Sport in Society, 27(10), 1549-1567. https://doi.org/10.1080/17430437.2023.2215324
Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. Public Affairs.
Nye, J. S. (2023). Soft power and great-power competition. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(2), 129-148.
Paris, R. (2001). Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air? International Security, 26(2), 87-102.
Steele, B. J., & Subotic, J. (2024). Icons and ontological (in) security. European Journal of International Security, 9(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2023.17
United Nations Development, P. (2022). New threats to human security in the Anthropocene. https://hdr.undp.org/content/special-report-2022-human-security
Vainio, T., Karppi, I., & Sankala, I. (2024). Perceptions and preferences of experienced security in mass urban events. Cities, 144, 104626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2023.104626
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mehdi Yari (Author); Majid Khorvash; Elham Moshkelgosha (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
